Sexual Sin: Is it the Worst Kind of Sin? by guest author Joel

One Sunday morning a few weeks ago, a few of us were curiously perusing the “tract racks” at our church.  What we found horrified us and led to us disposing of many of the tracts post-haste.  The tracts’ crimes were pretty basic, some starting off on the wrong theological foot, others wading in with both fists into copyright infringement, etc.  One in particular, though, bothered me particularly and it’s stuck with me over the ensuing weeks.  It was entitled something like “Why Sexual Sin is the worst kind of sin” and was written by a nationally famous Pastor I had assumed to be pretty legitimate.  

It just immediately struck me as the worst kind of thing you could ever put on a tract.  Anyone who is struggling with a particular kind of sin has a lot of needs, and I would doubt that any of those needs includes hearing “Oh, you’re struggling with XYZ sin?  Oh, sure– that’s the worst kind of sin.”  

The more I’ve thought about it since then, I’ve come to realize that Sexual Sin is really the BEST kind of sin!  It’s actually, relatively speaking, a gift!  

Strap in for my defense of this statement.

See, we know that all sin is equal in God’s eyes.  And we know, in our heads, that every sin makes God sick to His Stomach (or the divine equivalent thereof.)  It’s the kind of thing we’ve heard about for years.  And yet I put it to you that we don’t fully understand how some sins truly make Him “feel” that way.  Because, let’s face it, whenever we say “all sins are equal in the sight of God,” we’re usually talking comparatively– talking about Sexual Sin vs. every other kind of sin.  Sometimes I think we’re never 100% sure whether the “rules” are for good, or whether they’re just there to be “rules.”  That’s where Sexual Sin comes in—we know, clearly why the rules are there–no other type of sin is so gloriously destructive, so brilliantly life-shattering, and so powerfully vivid in the wide swath it cuts as it ruins lives.  On top of that, it’s such an incredibly efficient sin that it almost inevitably leads to more sin, from simple lying to your parents about “snogging” when you’re a teenager to, well, worse.  Like murder (David, etc.).  

And that’s why Sexual Sin is so great.  Yes, because it enables us to see, more clearly than any other sin, an earthly example of the ghastly toll that sin, any sin, takes.  See, we always carry on about how “all sins are equal” and what we’re doing, I think, is trying to dial down the sexual sin, when what we should be doing, in part, is ratcheting up in our minds the hideous effects of the other sins.  

When you see the smoking ruins of someone’s life (sometimes literally), instead of bolstering our secret convictions that, yeah, Sexual Sin is, in fact, worse, we could be thinking, as an exercise, wow, what other sins do I brush off that have these kinds of effects, just unseen.  My perfect go-to example for this is “gossip.”

Our church has a problem with gossip.  How do I know this?  It has a steeple and more than two people attend.  But truly–I’ve actually seen this sin at work in people’s lives (I can tell you specifically whom when we get together this week for coffee).  

If you think about it, church is basically a club—a “Let’s Beat Sin. . .Together” club, and somehow we’re not allowed to talk about each others’ struggles with sin?  (That’s just mean, God!)  Gossip is a great example as an “Other sins can include” List sin because the lure of it, the pure bestial joy we have when we’re about to hear about some putrid chunk of someone else’s life, well, it’s almost incomparable, isn’t it?  Almost.  And the effects of gossip are so insidious, so silent. . .that you might not notice the damage you’ve caused for years.  It’s magnificent.  

See, sin is the only thing on earth that doesn’t adhere to the Laws of Thermodynamics.  There’s no friction with sin, so no energy is ever lost, and the consequences get bigger the longer it goes unchecked.  The tiniest little lie, or story, or even wiggle of an eyebrow—you could power a church schism with it!  

Thankfully, due to the picture given to us by Sexual Sin, we can know exactly what we’re doing, in all spheres of our life.  We can be confident that the destruction wrought on the earthly plain by Sexual Sin is equal to that which we wreak on the heavenly plain for the “lesser-known” sins. 

To prove Sex sin’s place as the perfect earthly picture of the foul horror of sin, just look at what Satan tries to do—paint a picture of easy sexuality without consequences.  But of course—if something as obviously consequence-intensive as Sex can be made to seem consequence-free, then we can say, what on earth ARE those Christians railing on about with their tired old rules and regulations?!  They’re just trying to kill our fun.

Additionally, sexual sin the best because it can provide a perfect real-world litmus test for your faith.  I have a friend, a Christian “lifer,” who grew up insulated and virginal, who is getting set to marry someone who was more recently saved, as an adult.  Well, because of real life, the fiancée has a bit more of a “typical” past.  This simply crushes the lifer, two ways—one, the lifer has little experience in the “ways of the world,” so they’ve had no opportunity (blessedly) to be jaded by the easy sexuality of the world today.  Okay that’s good.  But the horror of what is now, sadly, commonplace, crushes the lifer—someone they love has been in that lifestyle.  Secondly, the so-clearly ugly consequences of this person’s past sins have awakened demons of jealousy (again, a perversion of a good thing) in the lifer’s heart.  But here is what is so great—if the lifer can embrace this person’s redeemed, forgiven, pure status in Jesus, the lifer’s faith is 100% affirmed!  It’s a truly and absolutely glorious opportunity to see whether you believe in redemption, and in the efficacy and power of the Blood.  Moreover, it’s so clearly a pass-fail test.  It’s just wonderful.  

I’ve always pictured myself instructing my as-yet unborn children in this area by telling them this:  Look guys, sins are sins.  They’re all hideous and yet there is forgiveness for all of them.  For Whatever Reason, some sins have consequences from which it is difficult or impossible to recover in an earthly sense.  A lot of these fall under a certain umbrella.  Maybe now I will add this:  It’s because sex is so illustrative of so many things, both in heaven and on earth, it’s because it can be so beautiful, that it can also be so frighteningly ugly.  There’s almost no end to what Sexual sin is teaching us if we’re looking at it in the proper light.  And perhaps I will say this–Do your best to learn from afar.  

Disclaimer:  Clearly some of this was written tongue-in-cheek, straddling the Screwtapeian line.  I wanted to see whether you could turn around the unfortunate statement made in the tract I referenced and make it somehow instructive.  All sins are bad and, unchecked, destroy your life.  Some more immediately and colorfully than others.

15 Responses to “Sexual Sin: Is it the Worst Kind of Sin? by guest author Joel”

  1. amybaker Says:

    when I first read your title, I literally laughed out loud, b/c I thought it was a joke, meaning, it’s the best b/c it’s the most fun! what a freaky mind I have! I think that is largely due to be raised around very legalistic people that would always try and scare us out of sin by trying to paint non-Christians as miserable people who are sinning, which they (our teachers) claimed was not really fun, and that all we need to do is tell them they need Jesus, and they will roll on out of their evil ways. This was destructive for two reasons 1.) it’s not true Biblically or socially 2.) once I figured out sin was fun, I felt lied to, and justified to do what I wanted.

  2. amybaker Says:

    I’ve also always found it interesting that in MOST, (not all) churches you will only see church discipline practiced when it is sexual in nature, or having to do with a divorce related to an affair. A church I once attended actually pursued discipline for pervasive, destructive, unrepentant gossip, and it was incredibly empowering as a church member to see that standard upheld.

    Although all sin breaks God’s law, it does not all have the same consequences…, jaywalking & murder are not exactly equivalent. In the case I mentioned, the gossip was far, far more destructive to the body of Christ than other folks who committed sexual sin in that same calendar year.

  3. Joel Says:

    AV: put up what you sent me.

    “A church I once attended actually pursued discipline for pervasive, destructive, unrepentant gossip, and it was incredibly empowering as a church member to see that standard upheld.”

    I was almost going to put in something about being approached by a gossiper, what if you started to take off your trousers? Like, you wouldn’t try to seduce me, so why are you approaching me this way? Like the Potiphar’s wife of gossipers.

    I definitely have a “gossip” problem, both literally, and it’s one of my burdens.

  4. av Says:

    i think our christian culture stresses “all sin is equal!” as a result of our obsession with getting people to pray the prayer. they start off saying all sins will separate you from God. and then say all sins are equal and use passages such as the one in isaiah to show that all our best actions are like messy loincloths (or as Joel pointed out the one where J says if you look at a woman lustfully you’ve already committed adultery). unfortunately neither of them are supposed to be qualitative, it is just saying how not helpful our best efforts are and how depraved we really are.

    so in other words there is no basis in our bible that all sins are equal and every basis that they aren’t all equal. think about rewards - some things have better rewards than others. and then go to punishments - some sins have worse punishments than others. We go to the OT law and God clearly has different levels of punishments based on the sin committed. While we often think of death as a normal punishment, there was almost always a way to procure mercy. It was only pre-meditated murder in which the guilty had to be executed. In our own culture we also immediately say murder is worse than lying, but then we say God sees all of them as equal right afterward in hopes to get people to cave and pray the prayer.

    my 2c at least. Joel told me to write this.

  5. Meade Says:

    The equality is in that they all merit wrath. Righteousness is pass/fail as far as merit before God. Hence their use evangelistically. They’re unequal in all the ways you described.

  6. av Says:

    Would you say (crazy analogy) that a straw and a vacuum are equal? In any scenario ever? Both do suck, but they have radically different strengths and applications.

    I just don’t think you can say they are equal in any sense of the word equal.

    You could say all sins separate you from God, all sins result in wrath from God - but there is no equality there.

    Here is an example of the main usage of equal from Random House Unabridged Dictionary: The velocity of sound is not equal to that of light.

    If we use the word equal like we are when talking about sin that statement would be “The velocity of sound is equal to that of light” meaning - they both have velocities. It is a very very very poor usage of the word equal and results in many people assuming that lying is identical to murder in G’s eyes. They are not.

  7. av Says:

    I think “all sin is equal” would fall under “Stuff Christians Like #12: Their Own Words”

  8. Meade Says:

    I totally agree. The equality usage comes from the evangelistic tactic of trying to show average, good moral people that they still need salvation. Hence the pass/fail thing. Like saying you need a savior even if your “biggest” sin is lying to your parents. The problem is that this evangelistic tool has become part of the evangelical midrash.

    I believe, like you seem to be saying, that there are different levels of God’s wrath even in Hell. There is a sense of proportion in God’s justice.

  9. av Says:

    Well there goes that debate. Joel, say something controversial

  10. Joel Says:

    I’m not 100% sure I agree with you guys. While I certainly understand where you’re coming from and agree with a lot of it, I have anecdotally seen problems with the application of “all sins are not equal.” Because let’s face it, deep down EVERYONE thinks some sins are worse than other.

    Example: the Catholic Church and her Venial and Mortal sins. Taken in context with their behavior-oriented teaching, I think there’s a great chance that someone can engage, fairly actively in the Venials and think that, comparatively, they’re “Okay” because they haven’t strayed into Mortal territory. Here’s the example that came up once in a discussion: Jeffrey Dahmer. Before his demise in prison, it was reported that he was “saved.” Whatever that means. To my one friend, who grew up steeped in that RCC Tradition of a comparative scale of sin, this idea was repellent. “It’s just not fair, I’ve lived my life and never dallied with any of those sins and basically, if he’s in heaven, I don’t want to be.” This is not an extreme person, this is nothing more than a pretty unfiltered look at the Human concept of Justice. In Human Terms, nothing Dahmer ever does should get him off the hook.

    This is veering back to the “salvation” angle of it. And heck, maybe there isn’t salvation for someone after doing all of those things, I can’t judge. But it seems pretty pivotal to our faith (at least the “street” version), to be able to state that “even” Dahmer could be saved. In order to pull this off, you have to be able to sell that, to some extent, sin = sin.

  11. Joel Says:

    Really the star of the story of me vs. Jeffrey Dahmer is grace. The problem as I see it is that you can’t measure the scope of grace, i.e., do it justice, if you don’t understand the extent of Total Depravity. And to me, that has to be found more in “the quiet but vicious little old lady down the street” than in “Despotic Mass Murderer.”

  12. av Says:

    There’s always dangers and we can be clear that sin does separate you from God and any sin in any amount is proof of deviation from God’s will. My only argument is I think we use “all sins are equal” when we shouldn’t use it. The statement introduces and encourages bad doctrine and incorrect understandings of God’s plan and work.

  13. Joel Says:

    Maybe as opposed to saying, “all sins are equal,” we should be saying, “all sins are hideous, some moreso than others.”

  14. Jeremy Says:

    1 Corinthians 6:

    15 Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Shall I then take the members of Christ and make them members of a prostitute? Never! 16 Or do you not know that he who is joined [4] to a prostitute becomes one body with her? For, as it is written, “The two will become one flesh.” 17 But he who is joined to the Lord becomes one spirit with him. 18 Flee from sexual immorality. Every other sin [5] a person commits is outside the body, but the sexually immoral person sins against his own body. 19 Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, 20 for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body.

    second, a great answer from Packer:

    Question: Are all sins weighed equally, or is one more important than another? —Linda Linton, Celina, Ohio

    J.I. Packer responds:

    This question leads into what for many evangelicals has become uncharted territory. We think of conversion as the moment when the guilt of all our sins—past, present, and future—is washed away by the atoning blood of Christ. As sinners justified by faith and heirs of promised glory, we rejoice in salvation and think no more about our continued shortcomings and how God might “weigh” them.

    If asked, we explain our attitude as true evangelical assurance. But is it?

    The Puritans of history were evangelicals too, but on this point they differed from us considerably. They remembered that Christ taught us to pray daily for forgiveness. One of their spiritual disciplines (not yet one of ours, generally) was self-examination each evening to discern what actions in particular, done or left undone, they needed to ask pardon for.

    In the forefront of their minds was the holiness of God, the awfulness of his anger, and his amazing patience in nurturing and correcting his irresponsible, recalcitrant children. These were the realities framing their certainty that the precious blood of Christ cleanses faithful repenters from all sin. Most later evangelicals were with them until the 20th century. We are the ones out of step.

    Scripture shows that in God’s estimate some sins are worse and bring greater guilt than others, and that some sins do us more damage. Moses rates the golden calf debacle a great sin (Ex. 32:30). Ezekiel in his horrific allegory says that after Oholah (Samaria) had ruined herself by unfaithfulness to God, Oholibah (Jerusalem) “became more corrupt … in her lust and in her whoring, which was worse than that of her sister” (Ezek. 23:11, ESV). John distinguishes sins that do and do not inevitably lead to death …

  15. Joel Says:

    okay, great points. i think everyone agrees, either ideologically or in practice that sexual sin packs a real mean punch.

    where do you go from there, though? from a repentance standpoint, from an evangelistic standpoint, “yeah, friend, those sins were worse than others you could have committed, but in Christ you can find repentance, etc.”

    i mean you know for a fact that given entrenched casual sin in our society

    i guess what i was getting at here was that the fruit of people who live their lives as if this were the worst kind of sin kind of stinks. i’d LIKE to make the contention that all sins are equal in God’s eyes just for the purpose of showing the power of grace. and the relative (great) distance of all of us from His true holiness.

Leave a Reply